MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Toyota » Hi-Lux » 1996

Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results

Registered in 1996
59.9% pass rate
from 397 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (70% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 7.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (70% worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 7.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (70% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.5% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Rear reflectors (4 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.5% fail on Electrical equipment (66% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.50% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.50% fail on Horn (83% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Position lamp (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.25% fail on Switch
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 9.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 5.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.25% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.50% fail on Decelerometer (19 times worse than other 1996 vans)
          • 0.50% fail on Service brake performance (19 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (59% better than other 1996 vans)
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (59% better than other 1996 vans)
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.50% fail on Service brake performance (85% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt
          • 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.25% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.25% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 3.3% fail on Brake pads (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.50% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.50% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.25% fail on Cable
        • 0.25% fail on Linkage
    • 1.0% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.0% fail on Pedal
      • 0.25% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.50% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.25% fail on Servos
      • 0.25% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.50% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.50% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.25% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.25% fail on Servos
    • 0.25% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.25% fail on Lever
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.8% fail on Chassis
      • 1.8% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.5% fail on Transmission
      • 1.0% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.76% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.50% fail on Joints
      • 0.50% fail on Drive shafts (79% better than other 1996 vans)
        • 0.25% fail on Joints
        • 0.25% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 1.3% fail on Body
      • 1.0% fail on Panel
      • 0.25% fail on Other body component
    • 0.50% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.25% fail on Pipe
      • 0.25% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.25% fail on Towbar
      • 0.25% fail on Coupling
    • 0.25% fail on Doors
      • 0.25% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.25% fail on Door condition
        • 0.25% fail on Hinge
    • 0.25% fail on Seats
      • 0.25% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.25% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.25% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.25% fail on Undertray
  • 10% fail on Suspension (39% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Springs
      • 3.5% fail on Leaf springs (6 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Leaf spring (9 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 0.76% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (11 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 0.25% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.25% fail on Spring saddle
      • 0.25% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.8% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (79% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.76% fail on Axles (6 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (12 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on King pins
    • 0.76% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.50% fail on Linkage
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.50% fail on Suspension arms (84% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.50% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint
  • 10% fail on Visibility
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers
    • 4.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.50% fail on View to rear
      • 0.50% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.25% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.25% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.25% fail on Windscreen
  • 9.3% fail on Steering (69% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Steering linkage components (170% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Drag link end (14 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.25% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.25% fail on Other components
        • 0.25% fail on Steering linkage
    • 1.8% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.3% fail on Steering box (15 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.5% fail on Power steering
      • 0.76% fail on Operation
      • 0.50% fail on Other components
      • 0.25% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 1.0% fail on Steering play (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Steering box (19 times worse than other 1996 vans)
  • 6.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 6.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
  • 5.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.5% fail on Compression ignition (130% worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 2.5% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.76% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.25% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 0.76% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.76% fail on Transmission oil leaks (14 times worse than other 1996 vans)
  • 3.0% fail on Tyres
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on Size/type
  • 1.8% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.76% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.50% fail on Attachment
    • 0.25% fail on Hubs