Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results

Registered in 1996
57.5% pass rate
from 1,284 tests in 2020
(9.0% better than other 1996 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (62% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 9.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (62% worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 9.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (62% worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Switch
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.1% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.078% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.39% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.23% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps (57% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp (53% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Electrical equipment (64% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.70% fail on Horn (77% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.078% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.78% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.55% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.55% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.078% fail on Daytime running lamps
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (21% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 6.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (73% worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 5.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (50% worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 0.078% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 6.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 6.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 4.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (62% worse than other 1996 vans)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.23% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.078% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.078% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 5.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.8% fail on Rbt
          • 4.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.078% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.078% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.078% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.078% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance (100% worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (100% worse than other 1996 vans)
          • 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance (100% worse than other 1996 vans)
          • 0.23% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.078% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.078% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.078% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.47% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (66% worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.62% fail on Brake linings (5 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.39% fail on Pivot (8 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Cable
        • 0.078% fail on Lever
        • 0.078% fail on Linkage
        • 0.078% fail on Relay lever
      • 0.62% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.31% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.31% fail on Brake drums (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 0.93% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.70% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.62% fail on Lever
      • 0.078% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.62% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.39% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.23% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.16% fail on Pedal
    • 0.39% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.23% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.16% fail on Valves
    • 0.39% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.39% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.31% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.31% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.16% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
        • 0.16% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.23% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.23% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 14% fail on Suspension (28% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (47% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.93% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.55% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.31% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.16% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.078% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.078% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.0% fail on Shock absorbers (140% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.70% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.47% fail on Ball joint dust cover (72% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (77% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Springs
      • 1.1% fail on Leaf springs (170% worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 0.47% fail on Leaf spring (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 0.39% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
        • 0.23% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
      • 0.47% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.23% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.23% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.55% fail on Wheel bearings (64% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Axles (5 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Axle (5 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Swivel joints/housing (8 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.39% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.078% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 9.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (40% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Transmission (51% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Drive shafts (49% better than other 1996 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Joints (49% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.39% fail on Joints
        • 0.23% fail on Prop shaft
    • 1.3% fail on Body
      • 0.62% fail on Panel
      • 0.55% fail on Other body component
      • 0.23% fail on Mounting fixings (4 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on Body condition
    • 0.93% fail on Chassis (74% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Chassis condition (73% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 0.70% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.31% fail on Pipe
      • 0.31% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.078% fail on Tank
    • 0.55% fail on Integral vehicle structure (84% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (83% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 0.47% fail on Towbar
      • 0.31% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.16% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.39% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.23% fail on Cabs
      • 0.23% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.16% fail on Seats
      • 0.16% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.078% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.078% fail on Carrier
    • 0.078% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.078% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.078% fail on Load security
      • 0.078% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.078% fail on Other tailgate component
    • 0.078% fail on Doors
      • 0.078% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.078% fail on Door condition
  • 6.4% fail on Visibility (32% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Wipers (33% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.23% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.16% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.16% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.078% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.078% fail on View to rear
      • 0.078% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.8% fail on Steering
    • 3.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.86% fail on Drag link end (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.23% fail on Other components
        • 0.16% fail on Steering component
        • 0.078% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.16% fail on Intermediate drop arm (5 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.078% fail on Locking devices
    • 1.7% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.4% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.31% fail on Steering box (5 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on Power steering
      • 0.47% fail on Operation
      • 0.23% fail on Other components
      • 0.16% fail on Pump
    • 0.86% fail on Steering play (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Steering box (5 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Steering rack
  • 4.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 1.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.93% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.078% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
        • 0.078% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.39% fail on Spark ignition (75% better than other 1996 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Catalyst emissions (81% better than other 1996 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.62% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.31% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.16% fail on Other leaks
  • 2.7% fail on Tyres (36% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.39% fail on Condition (81% better than other 1996 vans)
  • 2.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (50% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Seat belts (49% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas (52% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Condition
      • 0.078% fail on Attachment
      • 0.078% fail on Requirements
      • 0.078% fail on Pre-tensioners
  • 0.93% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.93% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.31% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.31% fail on Attachment
  • 0.078% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.078% fail on Speedometer