Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results

Registered in 1996
56.5% pass rate
from 1,286 tests in 2017
(9.6% better than other 1996 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (12% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (84% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 11% fail on Fog lamp (86% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.16% fail on Switch
    • 6.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.16% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp (33% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim (35% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.70% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.54% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps (63% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp (63% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.078% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 0.93% fail on Battery (69% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 0.78% fail on Horn (76% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 0.70% fail on Rear reflectors (190% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.23% fail on Lamp
      • 0.078% fail on Switch
      • 0.078% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.16% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.16% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 21% fail on Brakes (15% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (23% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 8.2% fail on Rear wheels (48% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Parking brake performance (65% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance (45% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.31% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.23% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.078% fail on Parking brake operation
    • 8.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.6% fail on Components
        • 4.4% fail on Pipes
        • 3.2% fail on Hoses (60% worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 0.86% fail on Valves
        • 0.16% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.078% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.78% fail on Leaks
      • 0.70% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Hub components (63% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake drums (7 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.078% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.078% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.93% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.39% fail on Cable
      • 0.31% fail on Pivot (5 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Clevis joint (8 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on Relay lever
      • 0.078% fail on Stationary pin
    • 0.86% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.86% fail on Condition
    • 0.62% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.62% fail on Pedal
        • 0.62% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.54% fail on ABS
    • 0.54% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.078% fail on Locking devices
  • 15% fail on Suspension (32% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (53% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage condition (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.86% fail on Attachment
      • 0.078% fail on Condition
    • 3.3% fail on Shock absorbers (66% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Condition (66% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Leaf springs (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 0.93% fail on Shackle (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Anchor
      • 0.78% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on Spring eye
      • 0.078% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.078% fail on Securing bolts
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms (55% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (56% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas (91% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Component mounting (91% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Spring mounting (88% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 0.78% fail on Drive shafts (67% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Front drive shafts (68% better than other 1996 vans)
        • 0.70% fail on Constant velocity joints (67% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.078% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.70% fail on Axles (4 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.62% fail on Swivel joints/housing (7 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on King pins
    • 0.70% fail on Wheel bearings (59% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Front
    • 0.23% fail on Coil springs (73% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Condition (81% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on Location
    • 0.078% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.078% fail on Attachment
    • 0.078% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 8.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Emissions
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.86% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.39% fail on Pipe
      • 0.23% fail on Cap
      • 0.16% fail on Tank
      • 0.078% fail on System
  • 7.5% fail on Steering
    • 7.1% fail on Steering system (50% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Steering rack
      • 1.6% fail on Drag link end (7 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Other components (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 0.39% fail on Steering pivot point (6 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Free play
        • 0.31% fail on Steering box (6 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.078% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.078% fail on Steering damper
    • 0.31% fail on Power steering (70% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Operation
      • 0.078% fail on Pump
      • 0.078% fail on Rams
      • 0.078% fail on Other components
    • 0.23% fail on Steering control
      • 0.078% fail on Steering lock
      • 0.078% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.078% fail on Steering shaft
    • 0.078% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.078% fail on Locking devices
  • 6.3% fail on Driver's view of the road (41% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers (45% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.31% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.23% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.23% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.4% fail on Tyres
    • 3.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Condition (63% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 0.078% fail on Valve stem
  • 3.6% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (55% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Body condition (47% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 0.62% fail on Vehicle structure (77% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.62% fail on Chassis (77% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 0.47% fail on Seats
      • 0.39% fail on Drivers
      • 0.078% fail on Passengers
    • 0.39% fail on Body security
    • 0.078% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.078% fail on Speedometer
  • 2.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (52% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Seat belts (53% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas (55% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Requirements
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
    • 0.078% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.078% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.62% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.54% fail on Attachment
    • 0.078% fail on Hubs
  • 0.16% fail on Towbars
    • 0.078% fail on Towbar
    • 0.078% fail on Vehicle structure