Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results

Registered in 1997
54.9% pass rate
from 747 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (74% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 8.3% fail on Fog lamp (77% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Tell tale
    • 5.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.13% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim (42% better than other 1997 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.40% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.0% fail on Rear reflectors (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps (61% better than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp (63% better than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.13% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.5% fail on Battery
    • 0.94% fail on Horn (74% better than other 1997 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.13% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.13% fail on Switch
  • 23% fail on Brakes
    • 15% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.0% fail on Rear wheels (51% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 7.4% fail on Parking brake performance (45% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.67% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.54% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.27% fail on Brake operation
    • 11% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 9.8% fail on Components
        • 6.4% fail on Pipes
        • 2.0% fail on Hoses
        • 1.9% fail on Valves
        • 0.27% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.27% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.1% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (5 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Leaks
    • 2.5% fail on Hub components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.80% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.40% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.13% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.13% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.80% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.40% fail on Linkage (5 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Cable
      • 0.13% fail on Clevis joint
      • 0.13% fail on Pivot
    • 0.80% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.67% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.67% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.13% fail on Pedal
        • 0.13% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.13% fail on ABS
    • 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.13% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 16% fail on Suspension (30% better than other 1997 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage condition (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.27% fail on Attachment
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 3.6% fail on Leaf springs (4 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Shackle (5 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 0.27% fail on Anchor
      • 0.27% fail on Anchor bracket (5 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Spring eye
      • 0.13% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.13% fail on Securing bolts
    • 3.1% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 3.1% fail on Condition
    • 2.5% fail on Prescribed areas (79% better than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Spring mounting (52% better than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Component mounting (85% better than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.1% fail on Front
      • 0.13% fail on Rear
    • 1.5% fail on Drive shafts
      • 1.2% fail on Front drive shafts (56% better than other 1997 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Constant velocity joints (55% better than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.27% fail on Universal joint (6 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 0.94% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.67% fail on Suspension arms (77% better than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (86% better than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Condition
    • 0.67% fail on Axles
      • 0.67% fail on Swivel joints/housing (17 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on General condition
    • 0.13% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.13% fail on Location
  • 8.0% fail on Driver's view of the road (28% better than other 1997 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Wipers
    • 3.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.40% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.40% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.27% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.9% fail on Emissions
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.67% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.27% fail on Pipe
      • 0.13% fail on Tank
      • 0.13% fail on Cap
      • 0.13% fail on System
  • 6.6% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 4.8% fail on Body condition
    • 1.3% fail on Vehicle structure (55% better than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis (55% better than other 1997 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Seats
      • 0.40% fail on Drivers
    • 0.27% fail on Doors
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.13% fail on Load security
      • 0.13% fail on Access panel
  • 6.2% fail on Steering
    • 5.6% fail on Steering system
      • 2.1% fail on Drag link end (7 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.80% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.54% fail on Free play
        • 0.40% fail on Steering box (10 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.27% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.13% fail on Steering box
      • 0.13% fail on Other components
        • 0.13% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.54% fail on Power steering
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.13% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.13% fail on Pump
      • 0.13% fail on Rams
    • 0.13% fail on Steering control
      • 0.13% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.13% fail on Flexible coupling
    • 0.13% fail on Locking devices
  • 5.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 5.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.27% fail on Condition
  • 4.7% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Size/type
    • 0.13% fail on Valve stem
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.67% fail on Towbars
    • 0.40% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.27% fail on Towbar
  • 0.54% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.54% fail on Attachment