Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results

Registered in 1999
56.1% pass rate
from 785 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (140% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 9.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (140% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 9.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (140% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.3% fail on Horn
      • 0.76% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators (47% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type (47% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.64% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.1% fail on Position lamps (160% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Position lamp (180% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.89% fail on Rear reflectors (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.25% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.13% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.25% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.25% fail on Switch
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 6.9% fail on Suspension arms (62% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Ball joint (63% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Suspension arm (7 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.38% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 5.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (37% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Springs (88% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Leaf springs (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Leaf spring (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.64% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.38% fail on Shackle bracket (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.76% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.64% fail on Linkage
      • 0.51% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 2.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint (160% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (60% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 5.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (9 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt
          • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.51% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.13% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 4.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.13% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.13% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.13% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.38% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.64% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.38% fail on Pivot (9 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Lever
        • 0.13% fail on Relay lever
      • 0.38% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.25% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.13% fail on Brake drums
    • 1.4% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.89% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.51% fail on Valves (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.13% fail on Servos
    • 0.64% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.51% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.38% fail on Other braking system component
        • 0.13% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
      • 0.13% fail on Other components
    • 0.51% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.51% fail on Lever
    • 0.38% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.25% fail on Pedal
      • 0.13% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.13% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.13% fail on Valves
    • 0.13% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.6% fail on Transmission (78% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Drive shafts (70% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 5.1% fail on Joints (72% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Prop shafts (120% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Joints (5 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on Prop shaft
    • 3.9% fail on Chassis
      • 3.9% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.13% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 3.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.5% fail on Body
      • 0.51% fail on Mounting fixings (5 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Other body component
      • 0.38% fail on Body condition (5 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Panel
    • 0.76% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.25% fail on Hose
      • 0.25% fail on Pipe
      • 0.13% fail on Tank
      • 0.13% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.38% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.38% fail on Cabs
      • 0.38% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.25% fail on Seats
      • 0.25% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.13% fail on Towbar
      • 0.13% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.13% fail on Load security
      • 0.13% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.13% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.13% fail on Doors
      • 0.13% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.13% fail on Door condition
  • 6.9% fail on Steering
    • 5.9% fail on Steering linkage components (77% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.76% fail on Intermediate drop arm (16 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.25% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Other components
        • 0.13% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.13% fail on Lock stop
    • 0.51% fail on Steering gear (77% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Steering box (12 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Power steering
      • 0.25% fail on Other components
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
    • 0.38% fail on Steering play
      • 0.38% fail on Steering box (6 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 6.8% fail on Visibility (33% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Wipers
    • 2.5% fail on Washers (50% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.51% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.38% fail on View to rear
      • 0.38% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.13% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment
    • 0.51% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 3.9% fail on Tyres
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Size/type
  • 3.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.7% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.64% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.38% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.51% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.25% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.13% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.89% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.76% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.13% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.76% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.76% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.25% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.25% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.13% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.13% fail on Attachment