MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Toyota » Hi-Lux » 1999
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results

Registered in 1999
53.4% pass rate
from 903 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 10% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 10% fail on Fog lamp (140% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Tell tale (200% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 8.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.9% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.11% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.11% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.9% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.44% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.11% fail on Switch
    • 1.6% fail on Rear reflectors (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.78% fail on Battery (69% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.78% fail on Horn (69% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.33% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 23% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.5% fail on Rear wheels (65% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 6.5% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.3% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (57% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.22% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.11% fail on Brake operation
    • 9.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 8.3% fail on Components
        • 5.1% fail on Pipes
        • 2.1% fail on Valves
        • 1.00% fail on Hoses (59% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.11% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.11% fail on Servos
      • 1.7% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
    • 4.1% fail on Hub components (76% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Brake pads (180% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.11% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.2% fail on Pedal
        • 1.2% fail on Anti-slip (170% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.89% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.89% fail on Condition
    • 0.78% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.33% fail on Linkage (15 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Lever
      • 0.11% fail on Cable
      • 0.11% fail on Clevis joint
      • 0.11% fail on Pivot
    • 0.66% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.22% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.11% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
      • 0.11% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 5.9% fail on Drive shafts (57% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Front drive shafts (55% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 5.6% fail on Constant velocity joints (56% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.33% fail on Universal joint (12 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Leaf springs (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 2.8% fail on Shackle (5 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.66% fail on Anchor (8 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Securing bolts (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Anchor bracket (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Spring eye (6 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage condition (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.89% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.33% fail on Attachment
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 4.2% fail on Prescribed areas (62% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Component mounting (69% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Spring mounting (44% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 4.0% fail on Front suspension joints (74% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.3% fail on Condition (8 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.3% fail on Front
    • 0.11% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.0% fail on Wipers
    • 3.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.66% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.33% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.22% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.8% fail on Body condition
    • 2.3% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.3% fail on Chassis
    • 0.33% fail on Doors
      • 0.22% fail on Drivers
      • 0.11% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.22% fail on Body security
    • 0.11% fail on Seats
      • 0.11% fail on Passengers
      • 0.11% fail on Drivers
  • 6.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions
    • 0.55% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.22% fail on System
      • 0.11% fail on Tank
      • 0.11% fail on Hose
      • 0.11% fail on Pipe
      • 0.11% fail on Cap
    • 0.44% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 6.2% fail on Steering
    • 5.6% fail on Steering system
      • 3.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.89% fail on Other components (9 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.89% fail on Steering pivot point (9 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.44% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.22% fail on Free play
        • 0.22% fail on Steering box (5 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Lock stop (26 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.11% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.11% fail on Intermediate drop arm
    • 0.55% fail on Steering operation (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.11% fail on Power steering
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
  • 5.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.55% fail on Condition
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
    • 0.33% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.22% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.11% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 4.9% fail on Tyres
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.3% fail on Condition (59% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.11% fail on Size/type
  • 1.6% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.3% fail on Towbars (190% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.66% fail on Towbar (5 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.66% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.33% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.33% fail on Attachment