MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Toyota » Hi-Lux » 2000

Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results

Registered in 2000
53.7% pass rate
from 841 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 12% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 12% fail on Rear fog lamp (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on Switch
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.0% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.12% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.4% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.95% fail on Horn (64% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.48% fail on Trailer electrical socket (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.9% fail on Rear reflectors (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators (52% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type (52% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.48% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.12% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.12% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 8.3% fail on Suspension arms (60% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Ball joint (90% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Suspension arm (14 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 6.3% fail on Springs (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Leaf springs (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Leaf spring (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.71% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on Anchor bracket (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on Shackle bracket (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Spring saddle (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.95% fail on Linkage
      • 0.36% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.36% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.12% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (58% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.6% fail on Shock absorbers (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.83% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 5.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.48% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (22 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.0% fail on Rbt
          • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.71% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.12% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (56% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (58% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (55% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (68% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.83% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.2% fail on Brake linings and pads (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 3.2% fail on Brake pads (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.48% fail on Cable
        • 0.24% fail on Linkage (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Lever
        • 0.12% fail on Clevis joint
      • 0.12% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.12% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.4% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.95% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.95% fail on Lever
    • 0.48% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.24% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.24% fail on Valves
    • 0.24% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.24% fail on Pedal
    • 0.24% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.24% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.12% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.12% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.9% fail on Transmission (58% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Drive shafts (57% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 5.0% fail on Joints (57% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Drive shaft
      • 2.3% fail on Prop shafts (96% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.83% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.12% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.4% fail on Chassis
      • 3.3% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.12% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.4% fail on Body (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Panel
      • 0.71% fail on Mounting fixings (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Other body component
    • 1.5% fail on Towbar (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Other towbar components (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.12% fail on Towbar condition
      • 0.12% fail on Coupling
    • 0.95% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.48% fail on Pipe
      • 0.36% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.12% fail on Tank
      • 0.12% fail on System
    • 0.71% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.59% fail on Cabs
      • 0.48% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.12% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.24% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.12% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.12% fail on Carrier
    • 0.12% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.12% fail on Floor
    • 0.12% fail on Seats
      • 0.12% fail on Driver's seat
  • 8.6% fail on Visibility
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers
    • 3.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.36% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.36% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.36% fail on View to rear
      • 0.36% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.12% fail on Driver's view
  • 7.8% fail on Steering
    • 6.9% fail on Steering linkage components (70% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.95% fail on Intermediate drop arm (16 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.24% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.24% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Steering component (34 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.48% fail on Steering gear (75% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Steering box (9 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Steering play
      • 0.36% fail on Steering box (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Power steering
      • 0.24% fail on Operation
    • 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.12% fail on Steering column
  • 6.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 5.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 5.0% fail on Prescribed areas (49% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.95% fail on Condition
      • 0.24% fail on Requirements
    • 0.36% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 4.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 3.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (73% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.12% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.12% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.12% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.48% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.36% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.36% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.36% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres (37% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.71% fail on Condition (67% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type
  • 0.59% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.59% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.12% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.12% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.12% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.12% fail on Attachment