Do you want the Road Tax system to change? Do you have thoughts on the potential changes to the Road Tax system? | No thanks
Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results
Registered in 200054.5% pass rate
from 859 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.
-
29% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
13% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 13% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.58% fail on Tell tale (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Switch
-
7.5% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.7% fail on Front lamps
- 3.1% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.12% fail on All position lamps
- 6.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 5.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 4.0% fail on Stop lamp (34% better than other 2000 vans)
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp
- 2.2% fail on Rear reflectors (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Direction indicators
(52% better than other 2000 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Flashing type
(52% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.47% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.12% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.7% fail on
Flashing type
(52% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Trailer electrical socket (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Horn (58% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.58% fail on Battery (72% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.35% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.12% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.12% fail on Lamp
- 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
13% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
22% fail on
Suspension
-
5.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 2.4% fail on Condition (19 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Attachment
-
5.4% fail on
Leaf springs
(3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
2.7% fail on
Pins and bushes
(4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Shackle (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.58% fail on Anchor (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 2.4% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.35% fail on Securing bolts (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Anchor bracket
- 0.12% fail on Shackle bracket
-
2.7% fail on
Pins and bushes
(4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
5.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(47% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
5.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 5.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (48% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
0.12% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.12% fail on Universal joint
-
5.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
4.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.3% fail on Linkage condition (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.58% fail on Attachment
- 4.2% fail on Front suspension joints (66% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
3.8% fail on
Prescribed areas
(65% better than other 2000 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Spring mounting (47% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Component mounting (78% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.35% fail on Subframe mounting (84% better than other 2000 vans)
-
3.3% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 3.3% fail on Front (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
2.1% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 2.1% fail on Condition
-
0.23% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.12% fail on Attachment
-
5.5% fail on
Suspension arms
-
20% fail on
Brakes
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
- 7.8% fail on Rear wheels (42% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 6.4% fail on Parking brake performance
- 2.8% fail on Front wheels (43% better than other 2000 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.4% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.35% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
8.3% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
6.6% fail on
Components
(30% better than other 2000 vans)
- 5.1% fail on Pipes
- 1.6% fail on Valves
- 0.58% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.23% fail on Hoses (88% better than other 2000 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.70% fail on Leaks
-
6.6% fail on
Components
(30% better than other 2000 vans)
-
2.8% fail on
Hub components
- 2.8% fail on Brake pads (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Mechanical components
(170% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Cable
- 0.23% fail on Lever (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Pivot (8 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Linkage
- 0.12% fail on Clevis joint
-
1.0% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.0% fail on Condition
- 1.0% fail on Restricted movement (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
0.58% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.58% fail on
Pedal
- 0.35% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.23% fail on Condition
-
0.58% fail on
Pedal
-
0.12% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.12% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
-
9.7% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.1% fail on Wipers
- 3.6% fail on Washers
- 0.35% fail on Windscreen
- 0.23% fail on Bonnet
- 0.23% fail on Mirrors
-
8.4% fail on
Steering
-
7.7% fail on
Steering system
- 5.2% fail on Track rod end
-
0.81% fail on
Other components
(4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.81% fail on Steering pivot point (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.70% fail on Ball joint
- 0.58% fail on Drag link end (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.35% fail on Intermediate drop arm (39 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.35% fail on Steering arm
-
0.23% fail on
Free play
- 0.23% fail on Steering rack
- 0.23% fail on Steering box
- 0.12% fail on Steering damper
-
0.70% fail on
Power steering
- 0.23% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.12% fail on Operation
- 0.12% fail on Drive system
- 0.12% fail on Pump
- 0.12% fail on Other components
- 0.23% fail on Locking devices
- 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas
-
7.7% fail on
Steering system
-
5.5% fail on
Tyres
- 4.1% fail on Tread depth
- 1.6% fail on Condition (52% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Size/type
- 0.12% fail on Valve stem
-
5.2% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(39% better than other 2000 vans)
- 3.6% fail on Exhaust system (36% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Emissions
-
0.47% fail on
Fuel system
(70% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.23% fail on System
- 0.12% fail on Tank
- 0.12% fail on Cap
- 0.35% fail on Emissions not tested
-
5.1% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
4.7% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.7% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.93% fail on Condition
-
0.58% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.58% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
4.7% fail on
Seat belts
-
4.9% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(41% better than other 2000 vans)
- 3.5% fail on Body condition
-
1.2% fail on
Vehicle structure
(55% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Chassis (55% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Body security
-
0.23% fail on
Doors
- 0.12% fail on Drivers
- 0.12% fail on Passengers other
-
1.5% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.5% fail on Registration plate
-
1.2% fail on
Towbars
(150% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.81% fail on Towbar (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.35% fail on Vehicle structure
-
0.35% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.35% fail on Attachment