MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Toyota » Hi-Lux » 2001
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results

Registered in 2001
52.9% pass rate
from 875 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2001 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 12% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (200% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 12% fail on Rear fog lamp (200% worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 12% fail on Rear fog lamp (200% worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Switch
    • 5.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.0% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.11% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.3% fail on Rear reflectors (5 times worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators (49% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type (49% better than other 2001 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (56% better than other 2001 vans)
        • 0.69% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.11% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.6% fail on Electrical equipment (58% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Horn (56% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 8.3% fail on Suspension arms (45% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 6.3% fail on Ball joint (100% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Suspension arm (14 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint dust cover (69% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 5.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (47% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (120% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage (180% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.34% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 4.9% fail on Springs (58% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Leaf springs (3 times worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 2.5% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Leaf spring (2 times worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 0.57% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.23% fail on Spring saddle (9 times worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Shackle bracket
        • 0.11% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
      • 0.34% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.4% fail on Wheel bearings (69% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (61% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.11% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.11% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 6.3% fail on Rbt
          • 5.9% fail on Service brake performance (46% worse than other 2001 vans)
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
      • 6.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 5.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.91% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (10 times worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 3.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (46% better than other 2001 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (52% better than other 2001 vans)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (49% better than other 2001 vans)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (62% better than other 2001 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (10 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt
          • 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance (79% worse than other 2001 vans)
          • 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.23% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.9% fail on Brake linings and pads (88% worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Brake pads (87% worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.0% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.46% fail on Pivot (42 times worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Linkage (9 times worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Cable
      • 0.11% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.11% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.7% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.57% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.57% fail on Lever
    • 0.46% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.34% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.11% fail on Valves
    • 0.23% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.23% fail on Pedal
    • 0.23% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.23% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.23% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
      • 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.11% fail on Other braking system component
  • 19% fail on Body, chassis, structure (20% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 8.5% fail on Transmission (88% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 6.4% fail on Drive shafts (100% worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 6.4% fail on Joints (100% worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Drive shaft
      • 2.3% fail on Prop shafts
        • 2.2% fail on Joints (6 times worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Prop shaft
      • 0.11% fail on Halfshafts
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.5% fail on Chassis
      • 3.5% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.3% fail on Body (86% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Mounting fixings (7 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Panel
      • 0.46% fail on Body condition (4 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Other body component
    • 0.69% fail on Towbar
      • 0.34% fail on Other towbar components (8 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.11% fail on Coupling
    • 0.57% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.46% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.23% fail on Tank
      • 0.23% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.46% fail on Seats
      • 0.34% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.23% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.46% fail on Cabs
      • 0.46% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.11% fail on Doors
      • 0.11% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
    • 0.11% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.11% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 9.0% fail on Visibility
    • 5.6% fail on Wipers
    • 2.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.57% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.34% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.34% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.34% fail on View to rear
      • 0.34% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.11% fail on Driver's view
  • 7.7% fail on Steering
    • 7.0% fail on Steering linkage components (43% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.91% fail on Intermediate drop arm (20 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.46% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.46% fail on Locking devices (5 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
        • 0.11% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.57% fail on Power steering
      • 0.34% fail on Operation
      • 0.11% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.11% fail on Pump
    • 0.23% fail on Steering play
      • 0.23% fail on Steering box
    • 0.11% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
    • 0.11% fail on Steering shaft
  • 5.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.5% fail on Compression ignition
        • 3.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.23% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.11% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.23% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.11% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.11% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.57% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.57% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 4.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.6% fail on Condition
  • 0.57% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.57% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.11% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.11% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.11% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment