Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results

Registered in 2002
53.2% pass rate
from 1,376 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 11% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on Switch (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Stop lamp (32% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.1% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.073% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps (43% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp (38% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Direction indicators (47% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Flashing type (47% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (47% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.65% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.15% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.3% fail on Rear reflectors (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Electrical equipment (66% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Horn (71% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.22% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.073% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.36% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.36% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.15% fail on Switch
  • 21% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.8% fail on Service brake performance (34% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 6.5% fail on Rbt
          • 5.5% fail on Service brake performance (42% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.15% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.15% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 6.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 5.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.87% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (8 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Parking brake performance (80% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt (75% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance (73% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.44% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.15% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.073% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.073% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.073% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.073% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (37% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (38% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.58% fail on Service brake performance (82% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.073% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.87% fail on Brake performance not tested (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (41% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (97% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 3.1% fail on Brake pads (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (90% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.58% fail on Cable
        • 0.29% fail on Pivot (11 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Clevis joint (29 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Lever
        • 0.15% fail on Linkage
        • 0.073% fail on Relay lever
      • 0.65% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.44% fail on Brake discs (66% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Brake drums (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Load sensing valves (51% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.65% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.44% fail on Pedal
      • 0.22% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.58% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.58% fail on Lever
    • 0.36% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.22% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.22% fail on Other braking system component
      • 0.073% fail on Other components
      • 0.073% fail on Additional braking device
    • 0.36% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.36% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.29% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.29% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.15% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 6.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.5% fail on Ball joint (63% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Suspension arm (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Ball joint dust cover (66% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes (92% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Springs (43% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Leaf springs (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Leaf spring (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.22% fail on Shackle bracket
        • 0.073% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.073% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
      • 1.1% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (33% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.36% fail on Linkage
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.15% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.4% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.073% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.15% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.073% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.073% fail on Ball joint
  • 18% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 9.3% fail on Transmission (85% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.9% fail on Drive shafts (53% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 5.9% fail on Joints (56% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Prop shafts (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Joints (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Prop shaft (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.073% fail on Belts
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.6% fail on Chassis
      • 3.6% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.8% fail on Body
      • 0.80% fail on Panel
      • 0.58% fail on Other body component
      • 0.22% fail on Body condition
      • 0.22% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.5% fail on Towbar (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Other towbar components (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.073% fail on Towbar condition
      • 0.073% fail on Safety device
    • 1.2% fail on Bumpers (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Cabs
      • 0.36% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.073% fail on Steps
    • 0.36% fail on Fuel system (66% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Tank
      • 0.073% fail on Pipe
      • 0.073% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.15% fail on Undertray
    • 0.073% fail on Load security
      • 0.073% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.073% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.073% fail on Doors
      • 0.073% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.073% fail on Door condition
    • 0.073% fail on Seats
      • 0.073% fail on Driver's seat
  • 8.4% fail on Visibility (21% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers
    • 3.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.65% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.36% fail on View to rear
      • 0.36% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.22% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.22% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.0% fail on Steering
    • 6.8% fail on Steering linkage components (41% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.51% fail on Intermediate drop arm (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.22% fail on Other components (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Steering linkage (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.073% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.15% fail on Power steering (79% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Other components
    • 0.073% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.073% fail on Steering box
    • 0.073% fail on Steering play
      • 0.073% fail on Steering box
  • 4.9% fail on Tyres
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.2% fail on Condition (54% better than other 2002 vans)
  • 4.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.6% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.5% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.58% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.22% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.15% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.36% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.15% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.36% fail on Fluid leaks (69% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Engine oil leaks (77% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.073% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.073% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 3.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (34% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.44% fail on Condition
      • 0.073% fail on Attachment
      • 0.073% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.22% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (82% better than other 2002 vans)
  • 0.73% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.65% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.073% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.51% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.51% fail on Attachment
  • 0.22% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.22% fail on Speedometer