Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results

Registered in 2002
49.5% pass rate
from 1,425 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 13% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 13% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.84% fail on Tell tale (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.070% fail on Switch
    • 10% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 4.1% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.21% fail on All position lamps
    • 8.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (20% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Stop lamp (27% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim (29% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps (40% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp (39% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Rear reflectors (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators (55% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type (55% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Individual lamps (44% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Side repeaters (77% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.84% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.56% fail on Battery (62% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.42% fail on Horn (83% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.070% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.070% fail on Lamp
  • 25% fail on Suspension
    • 6.8% fail on Drive shafts (48% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 6.5% fail on Front drive shafts (44% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 6.4% fail on Constant velocity joints (44% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.070% fail on Couplings
        • 0.070% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.42% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Universal joint (14 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.070% fail on Drive shafts
    • 5.9% fail on Leaf springs (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 3.1% fail on Shackle (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Anchor (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Other pins and bushes (13 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.21% fail on Spring eye
      • 0.21% fail on Securing bolts
      • 0.14% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.070% fail on Spring saddle
    • 5.5% fail on Prescribed areas (35% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Spring mounting
      • 2.2% fail on Component mounting (55% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Front suspension joints (62% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (32% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.91% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.70% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.49% fail on Attachment
    • 2.8% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.5% fail on Front
      • 0.28% fail on Rear
    • 2.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.070% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.070% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.070% fail on Axles
      • 0.070% fail on Swivel joints/housing
  • 24% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 9.2% fail on Rear wheels (59% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 6.0% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.1% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.1% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.91% fail on Service brake performance (71% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.070% fail on Gradient hand brake
      • 0.070% fail on Brake operation
    • 9.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 8.3% fail on Components
        • 5.8% fail on Pipes
        • 2.0% fail on Valves (38% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.70% fail on Hoses
        • 0.28% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.070% fail on Cylinders
      • 1.1% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Leaks
    • 3.6% fail on Hub components
      • 3.1% fail on Brake pads (67% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Brake discs (80% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.070% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.070% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.070% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Restricted movement (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.35% fail on Cable
      • 0.14% fail on Lever
      • 0.14% fail on Pivot (22 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.070% fail on Linkage
      • 0.070% fail on Relay lever
    • 0.49% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.49% fail on Pedal
        • 0.42% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.070% fail on Condition
    • 0.49% fail on ABS
    • 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.070% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
      • 0.070% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
    • 0.070% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.070% fail on Components
        • 0.070% fail on Pipes
    • 0.070% fail on Locking devices
  • 9.8% fail on Driver's view of the road (22% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 3.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.63% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.49% fail on Windscreen (63% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.2% fail on Steering
    • 6.5% fail on Steering system
      • 4.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.77% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.77% fail on Other components (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.77% fail on Steering pivot point (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.35% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.070% fail on Free play
        • 0.070% fail on Steering box
      • 0.070% fail on Steering box
      • 0.070% fail on Intermediate drop arm
    • 0.35% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Power steering (70% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Operation
      • 0.070% fail on Drive system
      • 0.070% fail on Other components
    • 0.070% fail on Steering control
      • 0.070% fail on Steering lock
    • 0.070% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.070% fail on Locking devices
  • 7.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 4.5% fail on Body condition
    • 2.7% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.7% fail on Chassis
    • 0.28% fail on Load security
      • 0.14% fail on Tailgate (8 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Hinged tailboard (8 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Body security
    • 0.070% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.070% fail on Doors
      • 0.070% fail on Drivers
    • 0.070% fail on Seats
      • 0.070% fail on Passengers
  • 5.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (31% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.77% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.35% fail on Cap
      • 0.14% fail on Tank
      • 0.14% fail on Pipe
      • 0.14% fail on System
    • 0.63% fail on Emissions (62% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.56% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.9% fail on Tyres (52% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth (47% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (58% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.070% fail on Size/type
  • 3.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.98% fail on Condition
      • 0.070% fail on Attachment
    • 0.21% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (84% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (83% better than other 2002 vans)
  • 1.4% fail on Towbars (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.77% fail on Towbar (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 1.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.98% fail on Registration plate
    • 0.070% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.35% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.28% fail on Attachment
    • 0.070% fail on Halfshafts