MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Toyota » Hi-Lux » 2002

Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results

Registered in 2002
52.4% pass rate
from 1,207 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 9.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 9.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps (40% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp (38% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.083% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.083% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.2% fail on Position lamps (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Position lamp (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators (68% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type (68% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.91% fail on Individual direction indicators (66% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.17% fail on Side repeaters (86% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Rear reflectors (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.91% fail on Electrical equipment (62% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Trailer electrical socket (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.25% fail on Horn (85% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.083% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.17% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.17% fail on Switch
    • 0.083% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.083% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 15% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 5.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (10 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.083% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 6.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 6.1% fail on Rbt
          • 4.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.083% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.083% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (33% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 3.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (67% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.25% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (14 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance (60% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt (59% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance (66% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.25% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.083% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.17% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.083% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.083% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake performance not tested (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (93% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.5% fail on Brake pads (94% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.083% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.50% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.25% fail on Cable
        • 0.25% fail on Pivot (14 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.083% fail on Linkage
        • 0.083% fail on Clevis joint
      • 0.17% fail on Brake discs and drums (87% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.083% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.083% fail on Brake drums
    • 0.99% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.66% fail on Pedal
      • 0.33% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.91% fail on Load sensing valves (59% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.66% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.58% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.25% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 0.25% fail on Other braking system component
        • 0.083% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
      • 0.083% fail on Additional braking device
    • 0.58% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.58% fail on Lever
    • 0.50% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.50% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.33% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.17% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.083% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.083% fail on Valves
    • 0.25% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.25% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.17% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.083% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.083% fail on Valves
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 6.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.5% fail on Ball joint (70% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Suspension arm (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.75% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes (90% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Springs (42% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Leaf springs (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Leaf spring (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.25% fail on Spring saddle (12 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.17% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.17% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 1.2% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.083% fail on Torsion bars
        • 0.083% fail on Torsion bar
    • 4.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes (83% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.58% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Linkage
      • 0.17% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage ball joints (81% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.083% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 4.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (40% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.2% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.91% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.25% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.083% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.17% fail on Sub-frames (83% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (78% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.083% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.083% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 9.2% fail on Transmission (88% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Drive shafts (62% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 6.1% fail on Joints (64% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Prop shafts (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.6% fail on Joints (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Prop shaft (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.33% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 4.7% fail on Chassis (55% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Chassis condition (56% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.083% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.6% fail on Body
      • 0.66% fail on Other body component
      • 0.41% fail on Mounting fixings (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Panel
      • 0.083% fail on Body condition
    • 0.58% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.33% fail on Tank
      • 0.25% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.50% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.50% fail on Towbar (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Other towbar components (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Towbar condition (15 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.083% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.33% fail on Cabs
      • 0.33% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.25% fail on Seats
      • 0.17% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.083% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.083% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.083% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.083% fail on Doors
      • 0.083% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.083% fail on Door condition
    • 0.083% fail on Floor
  • 8.0% fail on Visibility (24% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Washers (39% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.50% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.33% fail on View to rear
      • 0.33% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.25% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.25% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.9% fail on Steering
    • 6.4% fail on Steering linkage components (46% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 4.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.99% fail on Drag link end (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Intermediate drop arm (19 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Other components (8 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.25% fail on Steering linkage (12 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.083% fail on Lock stop
    • 0.41% fail on Power steering
      • 0.25% fail on Pump (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Other components
    • 0.17% fail on Steering gear (90% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Steering box
    • 0.17% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.083% fail on Steering play
      • 0.083% fail on Steering box
  • 4.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.7% fail on Seat belts (53% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.6% fail on Condition (92% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.083% fail on Requirements
    • 0.17% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (86% better than other 2002 vans)
  • 3.6% fail on Tyres (33% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Condition
  • 3.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.9% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.9% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.91% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.17% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.083% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.50% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.25% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.17% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.083% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.33% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.33% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.75% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.75% fail on Attachment
  • 0.66% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.66% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.17% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.17% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.083% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.083% fail on Belt(s)/padding