Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results

Registered in 2003
50.7% pass rate
from 1,335 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 10% fail on Rear fog lamp (200% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 10% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.075% fail on Tell tale
    • 10% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.1% fail on Front lamps
      • 4.3% fail on Rear lamps (45% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 7.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (35% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Stop lamp (31% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim (29% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps (54% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp (53% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Rear reflectors (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators (73% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type (73% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.60% fail on Individual lamps (78% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.37% fail on Side repeaters (66% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.60% fail on Battery (64% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.30% fail on Horn (87% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.22% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.15% fail on Switch
      • 0.075% fail on Lamp
  • 23% fail on Suspension
    • 5.8% fail on Drive shafts
      • 5.4% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 5.3% fail on Constant velocity joints
        • 0.075% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.37% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.30% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.075% fail on Universal joint
    • 5.2% fail on Leaf springs (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 2.4% fail on Shackle (7 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Anchor
        • 0.075% fail on Other pins and bushes
      • 2.3% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Anchor bracket (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Securing bolts (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Spring eye
      • 0.15% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.075% fail on Spring slippers
    • 5.1% fail on Prescribed areas (32% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Spring mounting
      • 1.5% fail on Component mounting (65% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Front suspension joints (93% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (36% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Condition (11 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.075% fail on Attachment
    • 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.0% fail on Front
      • 0.30% fail on Rear
    • 2.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (65% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (79% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (60% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment
      • 0.075% fail on Condition
      • 0.075% fail on Presence
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices (13 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.075% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.075% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 21% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.4% fail on Rear wheels (42% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 6.3% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.1% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (59% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.15% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.075% fail on Gradient hand brake
      • 0.075% fail on Brake operation
    • 6.9% fail on Hydraulic systems (32% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Components (35% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 5.3% fail on Pipes
        • 1.1% fail on Valves (61% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Hoses (76% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.52% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.37% fail on Leaks
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
    • 4.6% fail on Hub components (53% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 4.5% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Brake discs (85% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Brake back plates
    • 1.4% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.0% fail on Mechanical components (110% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Cable
      • 0.30% fail on Clevis joint (46 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Lever (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage
      • 0.075% fail on Pivot
    • 0.60% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.45% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.37% fail on Pedal
        • 0.37% fail on Anti-slip
      • 0.075% fail on Pedal linkage
        • 0.075% fail on Cable
    • 0.30% fail on ABS
    • 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.075% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
      • 0.075% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
  • 8.0% fail on Driver's view of the road (37% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers (31% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Washers (52% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.37% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.22% fail on Windscreen (82% better than other 2003 vans)
  • 7.6% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 4.3% fail on Body condition
    • 3.6% fail on Vehicle structure (77% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Chassis (77% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Body security
    • 0.075% fail on Spare wheel
  • 6.6% fail on Steering
    • 6.3% fail on Steering system
      • 4.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.90% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.82% fail on Other components (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.82% fail on Steering pivot point (6 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.15% fail on Steering box
      • 0.15% fail on Intermediate drop arm (10 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.075% fail on Free play
        • 0.075% fail on Steering box
    • 0.22% fail on Locking devices (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Steering control
      • 0.075% fail on Steering lock
      • 0.075% fail on Steering shaft
  • 4.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (38% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.90% fail on Emissions
    • 0.30% fail on Fuel system (76% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Tank
      • 0.15% fail on Cap
    • 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.7% fail on Tyres (57% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth (51% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.90% fail on Condition (75% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Size/type
    • 0.15% fail on Valve stem
  • 3.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (43% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.82% fail on Condition
      • 0.15% fail on Requirements
      • 0.075% fail on Attachment
    • 0.30% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (83% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (82% better than other 2003 vans)
  • 1.2% fail on Towbars (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.67% fail on Towbar (6 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Vehicle structure (170% worse than other 2003 vans)
  • 1.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.60% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.60% fail on Attachment