Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results

Registered in 2004
53.6% pass rate
from 1,742 tests in 2017
(9.6% better than other 2004 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 11% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.057% fail on Switch
    • 10% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 3.8% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.057% fail on All position lamps
    • 7.0% fail on Registration plate lamp (38% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Stop lamp (35% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim (32% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Rear reflectors (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps (55% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp (54% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators (68% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type (67% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.86% fail on Individual lamps (68% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Side repeaters (67% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.86% fail on Trailer electrical socket (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Battery (77% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.23% fail on Horn (89% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.057% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.057% fail on Lamp
  • 21% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.3% fail on Rear wheels (50% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.3% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.69% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.40% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.23% fail on Brake operation (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Gradient hand brake
    • 9.6% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 8.4% fail on Components
        • 7.5% fail on Pipes (25% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.92% fail on Valves
        • 0.23% fail on Hoses (76% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Cylinders
      • 1.1% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.75% fail on Leaks
    • 3.7% fail on Hub components
      • 3.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.34% fail on Brake discs (64% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Brake drums (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake back plates (7 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.11% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Mechanical components (160% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Cable
      • 0.29% fail on Pivot (22 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Lever (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Clevis joint (29 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage (7 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Relay lever
    • 0.98% fail on ABS
    • 0.63% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.34% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.34% fail on Pedal
        • 0.34% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.17% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.11% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
      • 0.057% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
    • 0.057% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.057% fail on Components
        • 0.057% fail on Valves
    • 0.057% fail on Locking devices
  • 20% fail on Suspension (18% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 6.6% fail on Drive shafts (48% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 6.3% fail on Front drive shafts (45% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 6.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (47% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Universal joint (13 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Drive shafts
    • 4.6% fail on Leaf springs (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Shackle (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Anchor
      • 2.0% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Securing bolts (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.11% fail on Spring eye
      • 0.057% fail on Spring saddle
    • 4.4% fail on Front suspension joints (83% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (31% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Condition (8 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas (61% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Spring mounting (42% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Component mounting (79% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Subframe mounting (82% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (75% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (65% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (88% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment
    • 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.5% fail on Front
    • 0.057% fail on General condition
    • 0.057% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.057% fail on Attachment
    • 0.057% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.057% fail on Attachment
    • 0.057% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 8.3% fail on Driver's view of the road (30% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Washers (40% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.69% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.57% fail on Bonnet (150% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Mirrors (90% better than other 2004 vans)
  • 6.6% fail on Steering
    • 6.3% fail on Steering system
      • 3.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.98% fail on Ball joint (120% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.69% fail on Steering pivot point (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Steering component (20 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Drag link end (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.057% fail on Intermediate drop arm
    • 0.17% fail on Power steering (80% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
      • 0.057% fail on Pump
    • 0.17% fail on Locking devices (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Steering control
      • 0.11% fail on Steering column
    • 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 5.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 4.3% fail on Body condition
    • 1.6% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.6% fail on Chassis
    • 0.17% fail on Body security
    • 0.11% fail on Doors (86% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Drivers
      • 0.057% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.057% fail on Seats
      • 0.057% fail on Passengers
      • 0.057% fail on Drivers
    • 0.057% fail on Load security
      • 0.057% fail on Hinged tailboard
  • 4.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (26% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.92% fail on Emissions
    • 0.46% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.29% fail on Cap
      • 0.11% fail on System
      • 0.057% fail on Tank
    • 0.29% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres (52% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth (45% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (61% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Size/type
    • 0.057% fail on Valve stem
  • 2.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (58% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts (48% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas (40% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
      • 0.057% fail on Requirements
    • 0.29% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (83% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (82% better than other 2004 vans)
  • 0.98% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.98% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.63% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.63% fail on Attachment
  • 0.52% fail on Towbars
    • 0.29% fail on Towbar (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Vehicle structure