Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results

Registered in 2005
55.1% pass rate
from 1,404 tests in 2020
(8.6% better than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 8.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 8.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Switch
    • 5.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.0% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.14% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.21% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.8% fail on Stop lamp (41% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (38% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamps (48% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp (44% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.57% fail on Horn (66% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Trailer electrical socket (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.071% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators (65% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type (65% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.00% fail on Individual direction indicators (59% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.85% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.14% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.14% fail on Switch
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.4% fail on Service brake performance (57% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 6.1% fail on Rbt (52% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 5.3% fail on Service brake performance (70% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 1.00% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.14% fail on Decelerometer (9 times worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake performance (10 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake performance (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.78% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (11 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 3.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.071% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt
          • 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.14% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.071% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.071% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.071% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.50% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (41% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (59% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 3.0% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.28% fail on Brake linings (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on Linkage (10 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Cable
        • 0.28% fail on Lever
        • 0.28% fail on Pivot (17 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.071% fail on Clevis joint
      • 0.57% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.36% fail on Brake drums (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Brake discs (83% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.8% fail on Parking brake control (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Lever (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.71% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Pedal
    • 1.1% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.93% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (50% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.78% fail on Hydraulic systems (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.14% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.14% fail on Valves
      • 0.071% fail on Servos
      • 0.071% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.28% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.21% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.14% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
        • 0.071% fail on Other braking system component
      • 0.071% fail on Additional braking device
    • 0.21% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.21% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.071% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.14% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.071% fail on Leaks
      • 0.071% fail on Valves
  • 18% fail on Suspension (14% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Springs (63% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Leaf springs (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.6% fail on Leaf spring (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Anchor bracket (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.071% fail on Spring saddle
      • 0.78% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.50% fail on Coil springs (79% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.50% fail on Coil spring (79% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.71% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.28% fail on Pins and bushes (82% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Suspension arm
    • 2.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (55% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.71% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.57% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.28% fail on Linkage
      • 0.071% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.071% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 2.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (47% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Other suspension component (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.071% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.071% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.071% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure (30% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 8.2% fail on Transmission (81% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.3% fail on Drive shafts (45% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 5.3% fail on Joints (46% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.071% fail on Drive shaft
      • 3.6% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Prop shaft (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Flexible couplings
        • 0.14% fail on Bearing housing
    • 4.8% fail on Exhaust system (37% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Chassis
      • 2.4% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.5% fail on Bumpers (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.00% fail on Body
      • 0.64% fail on Other body component
      • 0.28% fail on Panel
      • 0.071% fail on Body condition
    • 0.85% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.36% fail on Tank
      • 0.36% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.071% fail on Hose
      • 0.071% fail on System
    • 0.78% fail on Integral vehicle structure (59% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (58% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.71% fail on Towbar (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.21% fail on Towbar condition (20 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.21% fail on Seats
      • 0.14% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.071% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.21% fail on Boot lid (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Boot lid condition (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Cabs
      • 0.071% fail on Steps
      • 0.071% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.071% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.071% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.071% fail on Load security
      • 0.071% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.071% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.071% fail on Doors
      • 0.071% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.071% fail on Door condition
    • 0.071% fail on Undertray
  • 7.2% fail on Visibility (29% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Washers (37% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.71% fail on Bonnet (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.14% fail on View to rear (83% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Mirrors (83% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.071% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.071% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.2% fail on Steering (34% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.28% fail on Intermediate drop arm (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Locking devices (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.071% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.14% fail on Power steering
      • 0.071% fail on Operation
      • 0.071% fail on Other components
    • 0.14% fail on Steering play
      • 0.14% fail on Steering box
    • 0.071% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.071% fail on Steering box
  • 3.3% fail on Tyres (51% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth (38% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.93% fail on Condition (66% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 3.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (40% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (37% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.6% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.57% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.21% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.14% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.071% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.36% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.14% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.071% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.071% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.071% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.36% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.21% fail on Engine oil leaks (73% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.071% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.071% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 3.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (35% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.71% fail on Condition
      • 0.071% fail on Requirements
    • 0.78% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (58% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 0.78% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.78% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.78% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.78% fail on Attachment (170% worse than other 2005 vans)