MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Toyota » Hi-Lux » 2005
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results

Registered in 2005
53.9% pass rate
from 1,359 tests in 2017
(7.7% better than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 9.3% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Tell tale (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 8.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.6% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.22% fail on All position lamps
    • 7.3% fail on Registration plate lamp (31% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim (28% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp (44% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators (52% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type (52% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Individual lamps (55% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.22% fail on Side repeaters (77% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Rear reflectors (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps (65% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp (64% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.66% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.66% fail on Horn (62% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Battery (82% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.074% fail on Lamp
      • 0.074% fail on Switch
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.9% fail on Rear wheels (39% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.0% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.29% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.074% fail on Gradient hand brake
    • 7.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.4% fail on Components
        • 5.6% fail on Pipes
        • 0.74% fail on Valves
        • 0.22% fail on Hoses (74% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.074% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.074% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.59% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.52% fail on Leaks
      • 0.29% fail on Operation
    • 4.0% fail on Hub components
      • 3.5% fail on Brake pads (52% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.29% fail on Brake drums (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.8% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Mechanical components (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Cable
      • 0.37% fail on Pivot (45 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Linkage (13 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Clevis joint (47 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.074% fail on Relay lever
    • 0.81% fail on Restricted movement (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.74% fail on ABS
    • 0.52% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.52% fail on Pedal
        • 0.44% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.074% fail on Condition
  • 20% fail on Suspension (15% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.2% fail on Drive shafts (88% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Front drive shafts (86% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 6.8% fail on Constant velocity joints (86% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.074% fail on Couplings
      • 0.29% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.22% fail on Universal joint (9 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.074% fail on Drive shafts
    • 5.2% fail on Leaf springs (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Shackle (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on Anchor (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.074% fail on Spring eye
      • 0.074% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.074% fail on Securing bolts
    • 4.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 3.8% fail on Front suspension joints (60% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (66% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (72% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (69% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.074% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas (69% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Spring mounting (60% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Component mounting (75% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.074% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.2% fail on Front
      • 0.15% fail on Rear
    • 0.15% fail on Coil springs (95% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Condition (95% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.074% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.074% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.074% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.074% fail on Condition
    • 0.074% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 8.0% fail on Driver's view of the road (30% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers
    • 2.4% fail on Washers (42% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.66% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.52% fail on Bonnet (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Mirrors (79% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 5.8% fail on Steering
    • 5.2% fail on Steering system
      • 2.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.96% fail on Other components (10 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.96% fail on Steering pivot point (12 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.74% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.29% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.22% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.15% fail on Free play
        • 0.15% fail on Steering box
      • 0.15% fail on Steering box
      • 0.074% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.29% fail on Power steering
      • 0.22% fail on Operation
      • 0.15% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.074% fail on Other components
    • 0.15% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.074% fail on Steering control
      • 0.074% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.074% fail on Flexible coupling
    • 0.074% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.074% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 5.0% fail on Tyres (38% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.5% fail on Condition (54% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.074% fail on Size/type
    • 0.074% fail on Valve stem
  • 4.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.81% fail on Emissions
    • 0.44% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.29% fail on Fuel system (74% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Cap
  • 4.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.9% fail on Body condition
    • 0.96% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.96% fail on Chassis
    • 0.22% fail on Body security
    • 0.074% fail on Seats
      • 0.074% fail on Passengers
    • 0.074% fail on Load security
      • 0.074% fail on Tailgate
    • 0.074% fail on Spare wheel
  • 2.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (44% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts (52% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.74% fail on Prescribed areas (66% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Condition
      • 0.15% fail on Requirements
      • 0.074% fail on Attachment
    • 1.3% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.074% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.74% fail on Towbars (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Towbar (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.59% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.59% fail on Attachment