MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Toyota » Hi-Lux » 2005

Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results

Registered in 2005
56.4% pass rate
from 1,233 tests in 2020
(9.1% better than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (3.4% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 9.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 9.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 9.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.081% fail on Switch
    • 4.5% fail on Stop lamp (27% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim (16% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim (13% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (54% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (28% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamps (44% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp (40% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Position lamps (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Position lamp (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Rear reflectors (190% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators (70% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type (70% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.89% fail on Individual direction indicators (64% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Side repeaters (76% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.97% fail on Electrical equipment (61% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Horn (68% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Trailer electrical socket (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Battery(ies) (71% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.081% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.081% fail on Switch
  • 18% fail on Brakes (2.9% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (13% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (8.6% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 5.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (12% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.5% fail on Service brake performance (21% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt (19% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 3.9% fail on Service brake performance (34% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.97% fail on Service brake imbalance (6.9% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.081% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.081% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.081% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.081% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (36% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (31% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (46% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance (16% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.081% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.081% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.081% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.8% fail on Parking brake performance (22% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt (22% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance (22% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.32% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (52% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.081% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.081% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.41% fail on Brake performance not tested (10% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (0.59% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (20% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (55% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 3.0% fail on Brake pads (58% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (57% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Linkage (10 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Cable (43% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Pivot (9 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.081% fail on Lever
        • 0.081% fail on Clevis joint
      • 0.41% fail on Brake discs and drums (67% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Brake drums (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.081% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.2% fail on Load sensing valves (56% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (44% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system (42% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.97% fail on Parking brake control (72% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.97% fail on Lever (73% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.57% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (14% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Pedal (23% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.081% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.24% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (30% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Prescribed areas (51% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Other braking system component (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic systems (40% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.081% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.081% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.16% fail on Flexible brake hoses (57% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (28% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.081% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.081% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure (27% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 8.2% fail on Transmission (83% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.8% fail on Drive shafts (55% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 5.7% fail on Joints (55% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Drive shaft (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Prop shafts (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Prop shaft (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Flexible couplings (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.081% fail on Bearing housing
    • 4.3% fail on Exhaust system (27% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Chassis (57% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Chassis condition (55% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.081% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 2.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure (5.5% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (4.4% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Body (100% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Other body component (34% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Mounting fixings (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Panel (83% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.081% fail on Body condition
    • 1.2% fail on Bumpers (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.73% fail on Towbar (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Vehicle structure (200% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Other towbar components (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.081% fail on Towbar condition
    • 0.32% fail on Cabs (28% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Prescribed areas (52% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Floor (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Fuel system (77% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (30% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Spare wheel (44% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Spare wheel condition (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Load security (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Tailgate (13 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Tailgate condition (18 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.081% fail on Other tailgate component
    • 0.16% fail on Seats (55% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Driver's seat (33% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 16% fail on Suspension (24% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Suspension arms (23% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Ball joint (15% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Suspension arm (34% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover (86% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.081% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 4.6% fail on Springs (24% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Leaf springs (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Leaf spring (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Shackle bracket (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts (200% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.081% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.081% fail on Spring saddle
      • 0.89% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (63% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Coil springs (76% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.57% fail on Coil spring (75% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (43% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Pins and bushes (24% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (26% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (12% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Linkage (26% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint dust cover (21% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage ball joints (92% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (30% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers (25% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings (41% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Other suspension component (62% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.081% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.081% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 7.1% fail on Visibility (28% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers (15% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Washers (46% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Bonnet (71% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Condition of glass (64% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Windscreen (64% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on View to rear (77% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Mirrors (76% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.081% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.8% fail on Steering (24% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Steering linkage components (4.8% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Track rod end (20% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Drag link end (25% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.081% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.081% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.081% fail on Other components
        • 0.081% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.24% fail on Power steering (59% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Other components (13% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Steering play (38% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Steering box (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.081% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.081% fail on Steering box
  • 4.4% fail on Tyres (34% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth (13% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Condition (52% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Size/type (54% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 3.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (31% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Seat belts (20% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas (24% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Condition (14% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Requirements (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (43% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 2.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (53% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (48% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Compression ignition (47% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (45% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.49% fail on Emissions not tested (32% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (2.8% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (62% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Spark ignition (42% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (47% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.081% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.081% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.16% fail on Fluid leaks (82% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Engine oil leaks (78% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 0.89% fail on Identification of the vehicle (5.8% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.89% fail on Registration plates (7.0% worse than other 2005 vans)
  • 0.32% fail on Road Wheels (16% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Attachment (1.8% worse than other 2005 vans)