MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » FIAT » Scudo » 2008

FIAT Scudo MOT Results

Registered in 2008
48.6% pass rate
from 1,845 tests in 2021
(11% worse than other 2008 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Scudo is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (12% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 7.9% fail on Stop lamp (27% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Direction indicators (98% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Flashing type (98% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 5.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (160% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.43% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.38% fail on All direction indicators (180% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (75% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (73% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 4.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (73% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.054% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.27% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.22% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.70% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.33% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.33% fail on Horn
      • 0.11% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.38% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.38% fail on Switch
    • 0.27% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.27% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 19% fail on Brakes (14% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (47% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (65% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (67% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 6.6% fail on Parking brake performance (140% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 6.6% fail on Rbt (150% worse than other 2008 vans)
          • 5.8% fail on Parking brake performance (140% worse than other 2008 vans)
          • 0.65% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
          • 0.11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt
          • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.76% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.54% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.22% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.76% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.43% fail on Cable
        • 0.22% fail on Lever
        • 0.16% fail on Linkage (4 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.87% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.87% fail on Lever
    • 0.81% fail on Flexible brake hoses (150% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.81% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (48% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.60% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (130% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.43% fail on Rigid brake pipes (90% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.16% fail on Reservoirs (4 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.054% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.054% fail on Operation
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 8.9% fail on Suspension arms (41% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 7.4% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.76% fail on Pins and bushes (59% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Suspension arm
    • 7.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.92% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.60% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.33% fail on Linkage
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 2.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.7% fail on Springs (61% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.7% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.65% fail on Sub-frames (120% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.16% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.054% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.60% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.054% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.27% fail on Shock absorbers (65% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.22% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (14 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Operation (18 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Suspension unit
      • 0.054% fail on Other components
    • 0.16% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.054% fail on Macpherson strut
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure (66% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 12% fail on Transmission (190% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 11% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 11% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Flexible couplings (17 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.054% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.60% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.60% fail on Joints
    • 4.5% fail on Exhaust system (95% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.70% fail on Integral vehicle structure (54% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (57% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.054% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.70% fail on Doors
      • 0.43% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.33% fail on Door condition
        • 0.11% fail on Catch (7 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.16% fail on Door condition
        • 0.054% fail on Catch
      • 0.11% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
    • 0.43% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.22% fail on Pipe
      • 0.11% fail on Tank
      • 0.11% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.43% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.33% fail on Chassis (68% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Chassis condition (73% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.33% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.33% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.16% fail on Seats
      • 0.11% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.054% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.11% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.11% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.054% fail on Carrier
    • 0.11% fail on Body (82% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Body condition
      • 0.054% fail on Other body component
    • 0.11% fail on Cabs
      • 0.054% fail on Steps
      • 0.054% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.054% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.054% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.054% fail on Passenger compartment
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 5.9% fail on Wipers (33% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.65% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.65% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.60% fail on View to rear
      • 0.60% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.65% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.65% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.11% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.054% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
          • 0.054% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.11% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.87% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.81% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.054% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.0% fail on Engine oil leaks (85% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.054% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 5.9% fail on Tyres
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Size/type
  • 5.7% fail on Steering
    • 2.3% fail on Power steering (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Operation (4 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.22% fail on Rams (7 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Steering linkage components (58% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end (60% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.054% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.054% fail on Other components
        • 0.054% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.054% fail on Locking devices
    • 1.5% fail on Steering gear (72% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Steering rack (74% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Operation
    • 0.16% fail on Steering column (4 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.11% fail on Steering play
      • 0.11% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.054% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.054% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 4.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
    • 1.6% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.76% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.76% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.27% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.27% fail on Attachment
  • 0.054% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.054% fail on Anchorages