MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Isuzu » D-Max » 2016

Isuzu D-Max MOT Results

Registered in 2016
76.1% pass rate
from 5,015 tests in 2021
(11% better than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu D-Max is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 4.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 4.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Stop lamp (28% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim (43% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim (38% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.56% fail on Headlamps (71% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Headlamp (69% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.56% fail on Direction indicators (61% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Flashing type (61% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.20% fail on Side repeaters (79% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.48% fail on Reversing lamps (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Reversing lamps (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.42% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.34% fail on Trailer electrical socket (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.040% fail on Horn
    • 0.40% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.40% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.32% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (21 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (22 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.080% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 5.4% fail on Brakes (16% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Brake performance (28% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.90% fail on Rbt
          • 0.58% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.38% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.020% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.020% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.020% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.64% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (61% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.54% fail on Rbt (sp) (66% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.100% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.28% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.040% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.020% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.020% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.34% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.34% fail on Rbt
          • 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.020% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.020% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.100% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (43% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (34% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads (34% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Brake discs and drums (71% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Brake discs (71% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.060% fail on Lever
    • 1.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (87% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Electronic stability control (89% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.12% fail on Electronic braking system (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.64% fail on Rigid brake pipes (94% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.20% fail on Pedal
      • 0.18% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.34% fail on Lever
    • 0.14% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.14% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.100% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.080% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.060% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.020% fail on Reservoirs
  • 5.1% fail on Visibility
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers (33% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Washers (26% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.24% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.060% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.060% fail on View to rear (85% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Mirrors (90% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 3.5% fail on Suspension (23% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.080% fail on Linkage ball joints (82% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.040% fail on Linkage
      • 0.020% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.64% fail on Suspension arms (50% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.26% fail on Springs (83% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.12% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.080% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.020% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.020% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
      • 0.020% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.020% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.20% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes (11 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.020% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.020% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.020% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.020% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.020% fail on Suspension unit
  • 3.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (56% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust system (7 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Transmission (64% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Drive shafts (72% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Joints (78% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.060% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.100% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.100% fail on Joints
    • 0.26% fail on Body
      • 0.24% fail on Other body component
      • 0.020% fail on Panel
    • 0.20% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.100% fail on Towbar (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Other towbar components (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Towbar condition (33 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Safety device
    • 0.080% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.080% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.040% fail on Doors
      • 0.020% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.020% fail on Door condition
      • 0.020% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.020% fail on Door condition
    • 0.020% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.020% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.020% fail on Seats
      • 0.020% fail on Driver's seat
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres (31% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.2% fail on Condition (51% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.040% fail on Size/type
  • 1.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (42% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (40% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.00% fail on Compression ignition (37% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.42% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (69% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.22% fail on Spark ignition (54% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (60% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.040% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.020% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.040% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.020% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.020% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.68% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.54% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (73% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.100% fail on Seat belts (83% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.080% fail on Condition (85% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.040% fail on Airbags
      • 0.040% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.22% fail on Steering (79% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Steering linkage components (76% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Track rod end (78% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.020% fail on Power steering
      • 0.020% fail on Operation
    • 0.020% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment