Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results

Registered in 2016
83.8% pass rate
from 7,120 tests in 2021
(37% better than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (41% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim (21% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.014% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.014% fail on Switch
    • 0.52% fail on Stop lamp (75% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.48% fail on Headlamps (75% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (12 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Headlamp (90% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.48% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (74% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Direction indicators (77% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Flashing type (77% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Side repeaters (75% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.084% fail on Individual direction indicators (82% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.31% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.20% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.17% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.17% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.15% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.084% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.042% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.028% fail on Horn
      • 0.014% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.028% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.028% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 4.4% fail on Brakes (32% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.51% fail on Brake discs and drums (39% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.51% fail on Brake discs (39% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.014% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.014% fail on Lever
    • 0.90% fail on Brake performance (66% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.67% fail on Rbt
          • 0.49% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.11% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (58% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.084% fail on Rbt (sp) (67% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.056% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.028% fail on Service brake performance (82% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.028% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.098% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.056% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (97% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.042% fail on Rbt (sp) (97% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.014% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.028% fail on Parking brake performance (94% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.028% fail on Rbt (94% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.028% fail on Parking brake performance (93% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.53% fail on Rigid brake pipes (62% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.14% fail on Pedal
      • 0.070% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.18% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.18% fail on Lever
    • 0.17% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (70% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.098% fail on Electronic stability control (68% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.084% fail on Anti-lock braking system (80% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.042% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.028% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.014% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.014% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.014% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.014% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.014% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.014% fail on Other components
  • 4.0% fail on Visibility (25% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on Washers (40% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Condition of glass (56% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Windscreen (55% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.084% fail on View to rear (78% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.070% fail on Mirrors (82% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.014% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.042% fail on Bonnet
  • 2.0% fail on Tyres (58% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Tread depth (49% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.74% fail on Condition (69% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.042% fail on Size/type
  • 1.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (92% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Seat belts (74% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Condition (71% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.014% fail on Airbags
      • 0.014% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.00% fail on Suspension (78% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Springs (70% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Leaf springs (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.45% fail on Leaf spring (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.014% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 0.31% fail on Anti-roll bars (73% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.070% fail on Linkage
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.014% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.014% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.014% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.15% fail on Shock absorbers (65% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.042% fail on Wheel bearings (83% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.042% fail on Suspension arms (97% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.014% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.014% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.014% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.014% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.014% fail on Ball joint
  • 0.59% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (73% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.59% fail on Exhaust emissions (71% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Compression ignition (71% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.25% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (78% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.042% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.13% fail on Spark ignition (74% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.098% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (78% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.014% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.014% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.58% fail on Body, chassis, structure (72% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Transmission (72% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Prop shafts (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.056% fail on Prop shaft (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.070% fail on Drive shafts (92% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.070% fail on Joints (92% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.084% fail on Body (74% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.042% fail on Panel
      • 0.042% fail on Other body component (84% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.056% fail on Doors
      • 0.042% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.028% fail on Door condition
        • 0.014% fail on Catch
      • 0.014% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.014% fail on Door condition
    • 0.042% fail on Exhaust system (84% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.042% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.042% fail on Seats
      • 0.042% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.028% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.014% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.014% fail on System
    • 0.028% fail on Load security
      • 0.028% fail on Tailgate (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.028% fail on Tailgate condition (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.014% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.014% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.014% fail on Undertray
  • 0.37% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.37% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.11% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment
  • 0.056% fail on Steering (95% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.028% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.028% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.014% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.014% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.014% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.014% fail on Universal joint