MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Nissan » Navara » 2004

Nissan Navara MOT Results

Registered in 2004
54.5% pass rate
from 1,614 tests in 2021
(7.3% better than other 2004 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Navara is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.4% fail on Service brake performance (93% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 7.8% fail on Rbt (85% worse than other 2004 vans)
          • 7.4% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2004 vans)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.43% fail on Decelerometer (13 times worse than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake performance (13 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.19% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.25% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (10 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (50% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (61% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.62% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (8 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.062% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (47% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.37% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.062% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.062% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.062% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.062% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.062% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 7.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (45% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.81% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.37% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.19% fail on Cable
        • 0.12% fail on Relay lever (13 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.062% fail on Linkage
        • 0.062% fail on Pivot
      • 0.62% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.56% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.062% fail on Brake drums
    • 1.9% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.9% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.93% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.62% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.62% fail on Lever
    • 0.50% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.37% fail on Pedal
      • 0.19% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.37% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.25% fail on Reservoirs (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.25% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.25% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.12% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 0.062% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
        • 0.062% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.19% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.062% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 17% fail on Suspension (18% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 7.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.4% fail on Suspension arm (7 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.43% fail on Pins and bushes (74% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.062% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 5.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.0% fail on Springs
      • 1.9% fail on Leaf springs (130% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Leaf spring (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.37% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
        • 0.12% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.062% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.062% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
      • 1.3% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (110% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (65% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.68% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.062% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 1.2% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (120% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.062% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.50% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.19% fail on Sub-frames (79% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.6% fail on Exhaust system (140% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Chassis (100% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Chassis condition (100% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 2.7% fail on Transmission (42% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Drive shafts (62% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Joints (63% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.062% fail on Drive shaft
      • 1.4% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.56% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.37% fail on Joints
        • 0.37% fail on Bearing housing (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.062% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 2.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.6% fail on Body (78% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Mounting fixings (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Other body component
      • 0.43% fail on Panel
      • 0.12% fail on Body condition
    • 0.99% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.87% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Pipe
    • 0.43% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.19% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.19% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.19% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Bracket
      • 0.062% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.19% fail on Cabs
      • 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.062% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.062% fail on Towbar
      • 0.062% fail on Towbar condition
    • 0.062% fail on Seats
      • 0.062% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.062% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.062% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (28% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (55% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (55% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (55% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment (44% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.31% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.25% fail on Horn (80% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.062% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.93% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.93% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.87% fail on Direction indicators (75% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Flashing type (75% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.62% fail on Individual direction indicators (74% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.12% fail on Side repeaters (89% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.19% fail on Hazard warning (74% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Switch (74% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.062% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.062% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 10% fail on Visibility
    • 6.6% fail on Washers (37% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers
    • 0.37% fail on View to rear
      • 0.31% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.062% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.25% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.25% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.4% fail on Steering
    • 3.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end (61% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.62% fail on Intermediate drop arm (9 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Other components (11 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.37% fail on Steering linkage (13 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.19% fail on Steering component (9 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.37% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.25% fail on Locking devices (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Power steering (180% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Operation (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.31% fail on Other components
      • 0.062% fail on Pump
    • 0.56% fail on Steering play
      • 0.50% fail on Steering box (8 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.062% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.43% fail on Steering gear (66% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Steering box (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Operation (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.062% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.062% fail on Steering wheel
  • 4.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.5% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.9% fail on Emissions not tested (120% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.25% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.25% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.12% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.062% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.062% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.062% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.31% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.19% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.062% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.062% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.74% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.50% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Other leaks
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres (33% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.93% fail on Condition (64% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type
  • 3.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (35% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.68% fail on Condition
      • 0.062% fail on Requirements
    • 0.81% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (52% better than other 2004 vans)
  • 1.7% fail on Identification of the vehicle (84% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plates (86% worse than other 2004 vans)
  • 1.1% fail on Road Wheels (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
  • 0.12% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.12% fail on Speedometer