MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Peugeot » Boxer » 2010

Peugeot Boxer MOT Results

Registered in 2010
77.7% pass rate
from 2,515 tests in 2021
(52% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Boxer is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.7% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (49% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (28% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (55% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.4% fail on Side repeaters (59% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.95% fail on Individual direction indicators (52% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.080% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps (47% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp (51% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.040% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.8% fail on Stop lamp (68% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.99% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (56% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.99% fail on Rear fog lamp (55% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.95% fail on Rear fog lamp (57% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.040% fail on Switch
    • 0.52% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.52% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.28% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.28% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.20% fail on Electrical equipment (78% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Horn (74% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.12% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 5.4% fail on Brakes (63% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Brake performance (44% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (39% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (38% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.99% fail on Service brake performance (58% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.99% fail on Rbt (57% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.87% fail on Service brake performance (53% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake imbalance (72% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.95% fail on Parking brake performance (51% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.95% fail on Rbt (49% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.76% fail on Parking brake performance (55% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.20% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.36% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (65% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on Rbt (sp) (64% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.040% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.16% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (73% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Brake linings and pads (71% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.87% fail on Brake pads (71% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Brake discs and drums (83% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Brake discs (83% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.20% fail on Cable
        • 0.040% fail on Lever
    • 0.16% fail on Rigid brake pipes (96% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (88% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Anti-lock braking system (87% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (82% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.080% fail on Pedal (84% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.080% fail on Parking brake control (86% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.080% fail on Lever (86% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.080% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.040% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.040% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.040% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 4.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (26% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (24% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Compression ignition (25% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.2% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (39% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.080% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.040% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.040% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.87% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.83% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.040% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.36% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.28% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.080% fail on Other leaks
  • 4.3% fail on Visibility (51% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Wipers (44% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Washers (55% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on View to rear
      • 0.28% fail on Mirrors (61% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.080% fail on Condition of glass (84% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.080% fail on Windscreen (83% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 3.9% fail on Suspension (77% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms (59% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes (42% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint (61% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover (79% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.68% fail on Springs (86% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Coil springs (87% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.40% fail on Coil spring (87% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Leaf springs (86% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Leaf spring (91% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
      • 0.040% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.44% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.040% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.36% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (70% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.16% fail on Wheel bearings (90% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Anti-roll bars (97% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.080% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (86% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.040% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 2.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (68% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.52% fail on Transmission (87% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Drive shafts (86% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.48% fail on Joints (86% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Belts
    • 0.32% fail on Doors
      • 0.12% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.12% fail on Door condition
      • 0.12% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.080% fail on Door condition
        • 0.040% fail on Catch
      • 0.080% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.040% fail on Door condition
        • 0.040% fail on Catch
    • 0.24% fail on Body
      • 0.16% fail on Other body component
      • 0.080% fail on Panel
    • 0.20% fail on Seats
      • 0.12% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.080% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.12% fail on Integral vehicle structure (84% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (84% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Fuel system (74% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Tank
      • 0.040% fail on Pipe
      • 0.040% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.080% fail on Towbar
      • 0.040% fail on Safety device
      • 0.040% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.040% fail on Chassis
      • 0.040% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.040% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.040% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.040% fail on Engine mounting condition
  • 1.5% fail on Tyres (75% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Condition (58% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.48% fail on Tread depth (87% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.040% fail on Size/type
  • 1.2% fail on Steering (78% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.72% fail on Steering linkage components (84% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Track rod end (85% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.080% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.040% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.28% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.24% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.040% fail on Operation
    • 0.20% fail on Power steering
      • 0.16% fail on Other components
      • 0.040% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.080% fail on Electronic power steering (22 times worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.80% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (67% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.40% fail on Seat belts (74% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Condition
      • 0.080% fail on Attachment
  • 0.20% fail on Identification of the vehicle (70% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Registration plates (70% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.080% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.080% fail on Steps and stairs (16 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.080% fail on Retractable steps (34 times worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.080% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.080% fail on Attachment
  • 0.040% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.040% fail on Anchorages