Peugeot Partner MOT Results

Registered in 2016
70.0% pass rate
from 14,256 tests in 2021
(12% worse than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Partner is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (62% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Stop lamp (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamps (97% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.021% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.0070% fail on Dipswitch
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim (41% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (35% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators (19% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type (19% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.94% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.75% fail on Individual direction indicators (56% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.042% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.30% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.27% fail on Horn (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.014% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.0070% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.0070% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.24% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (68% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Rear fog lamp (68% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Rear fog lamp (68% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.22% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.056% fail on Reversing lamps (69% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.049% fail on Reversing lamps (72% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0070% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.049% fail on Rear reflectors (78% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.0070% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.0070% fail on Switch
  • 5.7% fail on Brakes (11% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.8% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.021% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.56% fail on Brake discs and drums (32% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.56% fail on Brake discs (32% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.077% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.070% fail on Cable
        • 0.0070% fail on Lever
    • 1.2% fail on Brake performance (54% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.98% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.97% fail on Rbt
          • 0.90% fail on Service brake performance (33% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.091% fail on Service brake imbalance (59% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.014% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0070% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.0070% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.15% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (91% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Rbt (sp) (91% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.077% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (71% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.077% fail on Rbt (sp) (70% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.056% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.035% fail on Service brake performance (77% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.056% fail on Parking brake performance (89% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.056% fail on Rbt (88% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.056% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (53% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.74% fail on Anti-lock braking system (78% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.014% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.79% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.79% fail on Pedal (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.063% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.042% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.021% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.049% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.042% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.0070% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.028% fail on Rigid brake pipes (91% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.021% fail on Parking brake control (93% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.021% fail on Lever (93% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 5.5% fail on Visibility
    • 3.5% fail on Washers (57% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Wipers (38% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.42% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.42% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.26% fail on View to rear
      • 0.24% fail on Mirrors (37% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.021% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.042% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.0070% fail on Driver's view
  • 5.0% fail on Tyres
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth (47% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Condition (28% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.028% fail on Size/type (76% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 3.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (51% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Transmission (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Drive shafts (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Joints (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.014% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.014% fail on Flexible couplings (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.098% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.098% fail on Joints
    • 0.36% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.17% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.098% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.056% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.014% fail on Pipe
    • 0.14% fail on Body (56% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component (54% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.014% fail on Panel
      • 0.0070% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.084% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.063% fail on Carrier (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.021% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.049% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.042% fail on Doors (68% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.028% fail on Door condition
      • 0.0070% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.0070% fail on Door condition
      • 0.0070% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.0070% fail on Door condition
    • 0.035% fail on Load security
      • 0.028% fail on Loading door
      • 0.0070% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.0070% fail on Other tailgate component
    • 0.028% fail on Seats
      • 0.021% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.0070% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.021% fail on Undertray
    • 0.0070% fail on Towbar
      • 0.0070% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.0070% fail on Passenger compartment
  • 2.7% fail on Suspension (40% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Springs (29% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Coil springs (20% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Coil spring (20% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Suspension arms (21% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.50% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.070% fail on Ball joint dust cover (56% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0070% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.54% fail on Anti-roll bars (53% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Linkage ball joints (51% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.070% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.014% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.0070% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0070% fail on Linkage
    • 0.11% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.084% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0070% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.0070% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0070% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.077% fail on Wheel bearings (69% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.042% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.021% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.014% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0070% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.035% fail on Shock absorbers (92% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.021% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.014% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0070% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.0070% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.0070% fail on Sub-frame
  • 1.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.091% fail on Requirements (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.014% fail on Attachment
      • 0.0070% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.0070% fail on Load limiters
    • 0.049% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (84% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.0070% fail on Airbags
      • 0.0070% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (43% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (46% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Compression ignition (45% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.50% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (57% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.084% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.042% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.035% fail on Other emission control equipment (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.0070% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.028% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.014% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.0070% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.25% fail on Spark ignition (47% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (49% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.014% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.0070% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.11% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.091% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.021% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.021% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.014% fail on Undertray
      • 0.0070% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 0.61% fail on Steering (41% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.53% fail on Steering linkage components (30% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Track rod end (32% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.035% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.014% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.0070% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.049% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.042% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.0070% fail on Operation
    • 0.021% fail on Power steering (88% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.014% fail on Other components
      • 0.0070% fail on Operation
    • 0.014% fail on Steering column
    • 0.014% fail on Steering play
      • 0.014% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.14% fail on Identification of the vehicle (56% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Registration plates (56% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.084% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.056% fail on Condition
    • 0.028% fail on Attachment (75% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.014% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.014% fail on Belt(s)/padding