MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Toyota » Dyna » 2010

Toyota Dyna MOT Results

Registered in 2010
60.4% pass rate
from 164 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Dyna is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 7.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 7.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 7.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.3% fail on Reversing lamps (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Reversing lamps (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 3.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.61% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.2% fail on Battery(ies) (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.61% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.61% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 8.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 4.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.3% fail on Rbt
          • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.61% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.61% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.61% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.61% fail on Rbt
          • 0.61% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 4.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.61% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.61% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.61% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.2% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.61% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.61% fail on Pedal
    • 0.61% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.61% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.61% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 7.9% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 3.7% fail on Springs
      • 3.7% fail on Leaf springs
        • 3.7% fail on Leaf spring
    • 1.2% fail on Suspension arms (79% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.61% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.61% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 9.8% fail on Visibility
    • 4.9% fail on Washers
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 1.8% fail on Condition of glass
      • 1.8% fail on Windscreen
    • 1.2% fail on View to rear
      • 1.2% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.61% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 6.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.0% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.2% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 1.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.61% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.61% fail on Other leaks
  • 4.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.4% fail on Body (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Mounting fixings (91 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Body condition
      • 0.61% fail on Other body component
    • 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.2% fail on Chassis
      • 1.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.61% fail on Exhaust system
  • 4.9% fail on Tyres
    • 3.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.61% fail on Size/type
  • 2.4% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plates (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 1.8% fail on Steering
    • 1.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.61% fail on Steering column
    • 0.61% fail on Steering play
      • 0.61% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.61% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.61% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.61% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp