Volkswagen Caravelle MOT Results

Registered in 1992
52.0% pass rate
from 75 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Caravelle is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 8.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 8.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 8.0% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 6.7% fail on Horn
      • 1.3% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Position lamp
      • 1.3% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 8.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 6.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 2.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.7% fail on Brake fluid (6 times worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.3% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.3% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.3% fail on Lever
    • 1.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.3% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 1.3% fail on Additional braking device
    • 1.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
  • 16% fail on Visibility
    • 6.7% fail on Wipers
    • 6.7% fail on Washers
    • 1.3% fail on Driver's view
    • 1.3% fail on Condition of glass
      • 1.3% fail on Windscreen
    • 1.3% fail on View to rear
      • 1.3% fail on Mirrors
  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 6.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 4.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.7% fail on Other suspension component
      • 2.7% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.3% fail on Springs
      • 1.3% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.3% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.7% fail on Transmission
      • 6.7% fail on Drive shafts
        • 5.3% fail on Joints
        • 1.3% fail on Drive shaft
    • 4.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.7% fail on Body
      • 2.7% fail on Panel
    • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.3% fail on Chassis
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.3% fail on Pipe
  • 6.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 6.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 5.3% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 5.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.7% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 1.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
      • 1.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.0% fail on Steering
    • 2.7% fail on Steering gear
      • 2.7% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
  • 1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.3% fail on Tyres
    • 1.3% fail on Condition