MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Toyota » Hi-Lux » 2000

Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results

Registered in 2000
52.3% pass rate
from 729 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 12% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (180% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 12% fail on Rear fog lamp (180% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 12% fail on Rear fog lamp (180% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.9% fail on Rear reflectors (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Direction indicators (55% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Flashing type (55% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.27% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.4% fail on Electrical equipment (56% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.41% fail on Horn (80% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.14% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.27% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.27% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 7.1% fail on Suspension arms (47% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Ball joint (73% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Suspension arm (11 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 4.8% fail on Springs (80% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Leaf springs (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Leaf spring (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.41% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.14% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
      • 0.82% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.14% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.14% fail on Coil spring
    • 4.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (70% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.55% fail on Linkage
      • 0.41% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (48% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.96% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.14% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.14% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.14% fail on Sub-frame
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (48% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 5.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.6% fail on Rbt
          • 4.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance (89% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt (96% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.14% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.14% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.55% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.55% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.27% fail on Cable
        • 0.14% fail on Linkage
        • 0.14% fail on Relay lever
      • 0.14% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.14% fail on Brake drums
    • 2.2% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.6% fail on Hydraulic systems (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Brake fluid (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Valves (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.14% fail on Servos
    • 0.96% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.96% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.96% fail on Other braking system component (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.69% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.55% fail on Pedal
      • 0.14% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.41% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.41% fail on Lever
    • 0.27% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.27% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 19% fail on Body, chassis, structure (26% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Transmission (69% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Drive shafts (63% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 5.1% fail on Joints (68% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Prop shafts (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Joints (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.41% fail on Prop shaft
    • 4.8% fail on Chassis
      • 4.8% fail on Chassis condition (56% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.6% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.69% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.55% fail on Tank
      • 0.41% fail on Hose (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Pipe
    • 1.4% fail on Body
      • 1.1% fail on Panel
      • 0.14% fail on Body condition
      • 0.14% fail on Other body component
    • 1.1% fail on Bumpers (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.55% fail on Cabs
      • 0.55% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.41% fail on Spare wheel (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Spare wheel condition (8 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Towbar
      • 0.14% fail on Other towbar components
      • 0.14% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.27% fail on Seats
      • 0.27% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.14% fail on Doors
      • 0.14% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.14% fail on Door condition
  • 7.7% fail on Visibility
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.55% fail on View to rear
      • 0.55% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.27% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.14% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.14% fail on Window
    • 0.14% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.14% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.3% fail on Steering
    • 5.8% fail on Steering linkage components (50% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.96% fail on Drag link end (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Intermediate drop arm (17 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.27% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.27% fail on Lock stop (28 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Steering play
      • 0.27% fail on Steering box
    • 0.14% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.14% fail on Steering box
    • 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.14% fail on Power steering
      • 0.14% fail on Operation
    • 0.14% fail on Steering wheel
  • 5.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 5.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.7% fail on Prescribed areas (64% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Condition
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment
    • 0.41% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 4.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.8% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.6% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.55% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.14% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.14% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
        • 0.14% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.14% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.14% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.14% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.96% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.96% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 4.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Size/type
  • 1.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plates